Re: Furypleasure by Åmol [insane] *reworked*
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 1:31 pm
you dont release and old map fixed, you release a challenge that has always been cheated noone playrd the map really this is like a whole new shit
DDraceNetwork Forum
https://forum.ddnet.org:443/
XDDDDDD never saw so much fake news in only one post lmaoKonsti wrote: Thu Feb 08, 2018 10:14 amXDDDDDD never saw so much fake news in only one post lmao, i can tell you dozens of maps where drastic changes also after 3 years have been made lol.jao wrote: Wed Feb 07, 2018 4:28 am It is against our policy to make such drastic changes to really old maps (older than 1 year). Releasing this again would go in hand with deleting all 67 ranks.
Another way would be to have this released as a second version, but the map was always pretty unpopular (the legit way) so it wouldn't really be worth it and it would be weird anyways.
Unless we throw away our beliefs some day and decide to clean up all low quality maps, I don't think this will ever be re-uploaded.
And just because your favorite kind of maps is shit with a good design dont call an amazing map bad.
And you already thrown your believes far away to became ddnet Staff lul
Currently it's Silex' and Pipous maps which fill up the servers, while Amol is overdoing his maps in a way that they get lost.Konsti wrote: Thu Feb 08, 2018 10:14 amNo plan of teeworlds Community but talking like a Community expert lmao. This map will be played cuz its amazing and we have enough point whores.jao wrote: Wed Feb 07, 2018 12:20 pm Ye I would rather use this exception to remove the map then. Would make more sense than releasing an old map again that won't be played anyways.
And as i remember its Amol whos maps make full servers even on years old maps.
I have always made maps that are a challenge to me.hi_leute_gll wrote: Thu Feb 08, 2018 2:00 pm Amol is overdoing his maps in a way that they get lost.
Maybe because it can attract players to finish the map the legit way...
I understood it a long time ago, but I also understand why this is in conflict with DDNet's 'agenda'.Åmol wrote: Thu Feb 08, 2018 7:21 pm Oh hi_leute_gll, are you ever going to understand my true agenda...
You write like you don't undestand so don't expect me to think any higher of you.hi_leute_gll wrote: Thu Feb 08, 2018 7:35 pmI understood it a long time ago, but I also understand why this is in conflict with DDNet's 'agenda'.Åmol wrote: Thu Feb 08, 2018 7:21 pm Oh hi_leute_gll, are you ever going to understand my true agenda...