Page 2 of 2

Re: xyz_ddrace2_nerd by Kryolith

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 4:26 pm
by Zargon
run_guy >> run_gay
Difficult 1.1 >> Difficult 1.2 >> Difficult 1.3
Difficult 2.2 >> Difficult 2.2

A few examples of what I mean with the last sentence

xyz_ddrace2 >> xyz_ddrace2_nerd is just the same as the previous cases, so I don't see why you decided against it

Re: xyz_ddrace2_nerd by Kryolith

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 4:27 pm
by Lady Saavik
Ah okay

Re: xyz_ddrace2_nerd by Kryolith

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 4:31 pm
by Welf
maybe deen should decide if ddnet needs more than 1 version of 1 map ^^

but he will probably let the testers decide ^^

i had a look at the map, there is nothing special, some oldschool parts, it is now faily
testers should play it and decide if it is good/fun

Re: xyz_ddrace2_nerd by Kryolith

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 1:43 am
by Zargon
So could someone who didnt see this map evaluate it? I think the decision taken was a bit too hasty

Re: xyz_ddrace2_nerd by Kryolith

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 8:45 am
by Broken
Hey Zargon I had a look. It's a cute rendition of xyz_2 but there is not enough changes to justify having both. I like it though... it's very close to the original but it's nicely done. I for one, wouldn't mind replacing the current altered version on ddnet with it, but we all know something like that will never happen. To be honest Zargon, it's hard enough to get good original content on ddnet, let alone something like this.