Forum - DDraceNetwork

I agree that the request should be indexed using IP, in both direction: who send the request and who is targeted. So blockers will not leave/enter to reset the amount of request, and fun voters will not leave/enter to send directly the good amount of request.

And this would not lead to a solution for the full-server-block-problem timakro mentioned. Here you can start with limiting the vote participants to a number like 16. So just the first 16 votes would count in this example. Dunno, hi_leute had arguments against it, but you can try first if it solves the problem. If not revert it.

I don't see your point here. Why you should trust the first 16 players more than the others ?

In all case, if there is half of the server filled with blockers, I think the good solution is just to leave and play in an other server :/

kamillentee wrote:Here you can start with limiting the vote participants to a number like 16.

I think your intention is to give less players a chance to kick someone when the majority isn't voting at all. Instead we could just decrease the percentage of players that need to vote yes for a kick vote to pass.

timakro wrote:

kamillentee wrote:Here you can start with limiting the vote participants to a number like 16.

I think your intention is to give less players a chance to kick someone when the majority isn't voting at all. Instead we could just decrease the percentage of players that need to vote yes for a kick vote to pass.

just turn on sv_vote_majority?

timakro wrote:

kamillentee wrote:Here you can start with limiting the vote participants to a number like 16.

I think your intention is to give less players a chance to kick someone when the majority isn't voting at all. Instead we could just decrease the percentage of players that need to vote yes for a kick vote to pass.

We do this on KoG servers. Does not work that well. I mean its effective against blockers, but there often funvotes.