Page 5 of 6
Re: tripleblock
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:51 pm
by RayB.
Thanks for the information Lumina, the topics are merged now.
Re: tripleblock
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 7:14 pm
by triki
upd:
Re: tripleblock
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 11:17 pm
by triki
UPD
Re: tripleblock
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 1:24 pm
by VipeR
On the first look, the map can be seem as not good. But it contains some really creative parts.
The design and the amount of info on screen is a bit confunsing, as the fact that you can do certain part in various ways.
But that cant be the reason to declinded it. RayB, as i heard, just looked the map for 5 min with Super. That cant be the Standard of testing. I know some players which really enjoyed the map (such as Starkiller and ohters).
Ofc its not ready at the moment, but thats because no tester give it a try.
And i dont get why this map and JungleRabies are not in the Maps prioritization list.
"based on the date of publishing" Both 2015
"The list just shows which maps deserve to get tested earlier than the other." I will say it again 2015!!!!
Re: tripleblock
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 3:28 pm
by RayB.
VipeR wrote:On the first look, the map can be seem as not good. But it contains some really creative parts.
The design and the amount of info on screen is a bit confunsing, as the fact that you can do certain part in various ways.
1-2 creative parts don't make a map good neither release worthy
VipeR wrote:
But that cant be the reason to declinded it. RayB, as i heard, just looked the map for 5 min with Super. That cant be the Standard of testing. I know some players which really enjoyed the map (such as Starkiller and ohters).
Hold on and read my post again because you are making up the reasons why I declined the map. The real reasons might be helpful when you go on testing this map.
Also you should question what you hear because I spent more than just 5min on this map.... I even tested this map with the mapper multiple times and Genex.
VipeR wrote:
Ofc its not ready at the moment, but thats because no tester give it a try.
Then give It a try. I didn't bring the map back so you can only question how I tested the map.
VipeR wrote:
And i dont get why this map and JungleRabies are not in the Maps prioritization list.
"based on the date of publishing" Both 2015
"The list just shows which maps deserve to get tested earlier than the other." I will say it again 2015!!!!
Maybe because I just brought both maps back from archive ?

Re: tripleblock
Posted: Fri May 05, 2017 10:11 am
by triki
RayB. wrote:
1-2 creative parts don't make a map good neither release worthy

Confirms this
Re: tripleblock
Posted: Fri May 05, 2017 11:04 pm
by triki
.
Re: tripleblock
Posted: Fri May 05, 2017 11:04 pm
by Freezestyler
Solid, good map with some really creative parts, I don't get why we shouldn't release the map.
Re: Tripleblocks by triki [Brutal]
Posted: Wed May 10, 2017 10:03 pm
by triki
upd: map
How many opinions need?
Re: Tripleblocks by triki [Brutal]
Posted: Sun May 21, 2017 1:48 am
by jao
Tested with Konsti and triki.
I don't like the map, the ideas are mostly good, but it's very bad mapped and the map has no concept. Parts don't really fit to each other and are unbalanced sometimes. Because of this, "creative parts" isn't a strong enough argument to release it imo.
Feel free to discuss this
