xyz_ddrace2_nerd by Kryolith

Share your ddrace-related map with the community.
The official map testing moved to our discord (https://ddnet.org/discord).
Forum rules
You can join the official testservers and support the testing staff anytime.
Be sure to share your feedback in the appropiate discord channel.
  • Server PW: nimrocks
  • Rcon Access (F2): test4321
Zargon
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2014 10:19 pm

Re: xyz_ddrace2_nerd by Kryolith

Post by Zargon »

run_guy >> run_gay
Difficult 1.1 >> Difficult 1.2 >> Difficult 1.3
Difficult 2.2 >> Difficult 2.2

A few examples of what I mean with the last sentence

xyz_ddrace2 >> xyz_ddrace2_nerd is just the same as the previous cases, so I don't see why you decided against it
User avatar
Lady Saavik
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 4:02 pm
Player profile: http://ddnet.org/players/Lady-32-Saavik/
Mapper profile: http://ddnet.tw/mappers/Saavik/

Re: xyz_ddrace2_nerd by Kryolith

Post by Lady Saavik »

Ah okay
Welf
Posts: 1838
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:20 am
Player profile: http://ddnet.org/players/Welf/
Mapper profile: http://ddnet.tw/mappers/Welf/

Re: xyz_ddrace2_nerd by Kryolith

Post by Welf »

maybe deen should decide if ddnet needs more than 1 version of 1 map ^^

but he will probably let the testers decide ^^

i had a look at the map, there is nothing special, some oldschool parts, it is now faily
testers should play it and decide if it is good/fun
Zargon
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2014 10:19 pm

Re: xyz_ddrace2_nerd by Kryolith

Post by Zargon »

So could someone who didnt see this map evaluate it? I think the decision taken was a bit too hasty
User avatar
Broken
Posts: 405
Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 12:25 pm
Player profile: http://ddnet.org/players/Broken/
Mapper profile: http://ddnet.tw/mappers/Broken/

Re: xyz_ddrace2_nerd by Kryolith

Post by Broken »

Hey Zargon I had a look. It's a cute rendition of xyz_2 but there is not enough changes to justify having both. I like it though... it's very close to the original but it's nicely done. I for one, wouldn't mind replacing the current altered version on ddnet with it, but we all know something like that will never happen. To be honest Zargon, it's hard enough to get good original content on ddnet, let alone something like this.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests